Legal Opinion

Potter v. Robbins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

The appellant, W. H. Potter, duly filed his petition before.the Chancellor of the second division, to contest the election of the defendant, M. J. Bobbins, to the office of County Judge for Scott County, at the August election, 1926.

The petition averred that Potter received the majority of the legal votes cast at said election, and was entitled to the office, notwithstanding Bobbins was given a majority on the face of the returns.

The petition contained a prayer for a decree that Potter was entitled to the office, and also an alternative prayer that the election be declared void because…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heyfron v. MahoneyMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Moore v. SharpTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Berg v. VeitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Red River Furnace Co. v. Tennessee Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Heard v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Burrell v. Mississippi State Tax Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Candidacy of DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Barham v. DenisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API