Morton v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal by the estate of Carl B. Morton, which appeal is restricted to the issue of whether a $24,000 judgment in favor of one Wanda J. Rogers against the estate of Carl B. Morton was sustained by the evidence and applicable law.
In reviewing the evidence presented in this case in a light most favorable to upholding the judgment, we find the facts to be as follows. Wanda J. and Harry H. Rogers, during their marriage were the principal officers, directors and stockholders of H. H. Rogers Company, an Illinois corporation, which manufactured and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Allen v. Hamman Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Isenberg v. LemonArizona Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gaughan v. NATIONAL CUTTING HORSE ASS'N, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Meyer v. Ford Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Supplies for Industry, Inc. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- In Re Paul Kun, AKA Pal Kun, Debtor. James L. Hodge and Sue P. Hodge, AKA Oma Suzanne Hodge, Husband and Wife v. Paul Kun, AKA Pal KunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Choisser v. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.