Legal Opinion

Penick v. Christensen

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 4, 1996No. 14-94-00209-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMIDEI, Justice.

This appeal is from a take nothing judgment after a partial summary judgment and jury trial in a medical malpractice and product liability action. Appellant, Gaylon Joe Penick (“Penick”), sued Dr. Cecil Christensen (“Dr. Christensen”) and Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. and Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”), appellees, for damages related to hip replacement surgery performed by Dr. Christensen. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Penick had broken his right hip in an automobile accident in 1958, and developed an osteoarthritic condition in the hip. Dr.…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Earle v. RatliffTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sanders v. Palunsky, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Knoll v. Neblett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. In Re K.S., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  5. Hiroms v. Scheffey, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API