State v. George
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Per curiam
¶1 Larry George, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence reduction and "emergency motion for release." The State contends George's present claims are procedurally barred or otherwise precluded by the law of the case doctrine. We agree and, therefore, affirm the order.
BACKGROUND
¶2 The present appeal arises from the denial of George's motion for sentence reduction. This case, however, is but another attempt by George to challenge his sentence computations in Winnebago County Circuit Court case No. 1986CF175 and Brown County Circuit Court case No. 1996CF163. As recounted in an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Univest Corp. v. General Split Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WitkowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- State v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.