Legal Opinion

Hammermeister v. Riverside Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1982No. Docket 56665PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

Appellant appeals by leave granted from an order entered in the Oakland County Circuit Court granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that appellant had improperly offset appellee’s Social Security retirement benefits from wage-loss benefits due her under MCL 500.3107; MSA 24.13107. The trial court found that there existed no genuine issue as to any material fact. GCR 1963, 117.2(3).

This suit arose out of a March 25, 1979, automobile accident. At the time of the accident, appellee was 65 years of age and was collecting old-age Social Security benefits.

When…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Johnston v. Manhattan Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Struble v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Calhoun v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Companies v. LotzDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  4. DeLuca v. Amica Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API