Legal Opinion

Hibernia Commercial & Savings Bank v. McArthur

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The complaint contains the usual allegations, among which is that the plaintiff is now, and it and its predecessors in interest have been, the owners in fee and in the open and notorious, continuous and adverse possession of said lots for more than ten years prior to date. The defense attempted to be made by Alice C. Borthwick, intervener, was an attack upon the title held by plaintiff, for the reason the same is based upon a tax sale by Multnomah County made in 1904 to one Aloys Harold, of the property theretofore sold to Multnomah County for delinquent taxes for the years 1892, 1893, 1894,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Getchell v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Keerins Bros. v. MauneyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Keerins Bros. v. MauneyOregon Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API