Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Memphis & C. R.

United States Circuit Court

Decided April 24, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion for New Trial. This is the same ease reported, as to the facts relating to the issuance of the bill of lading, in 9 Fed. Bbp. 129, and those facts are omitted here.

Read the full summary

Motion for New Trial. This is the same ease reported, as to the facts relating to the issuance of the bill of lading, in 9 Fed. Bbp. 129, and those facts are omitted here. On the trial it was proved that Chiles had on hand at the time the bill of lading was issued, five or seven bales of cotton, marked as described in the plaintiff’s bill of lading, and already in the hands of the railroad agents; that subsequently and prior to the first of July he sent from time to time to the agents at the depot 21 or more bales, making in all 27 bales; that from their mode of doing-business with Chiles and…

1Opinion of the CourtHamwoND, J.

The judgment of this court upon the demurrer to the defendant’s pleas having been recently confirmed by an opinion of the supreme court, the further consideration of the questions raised by the demurrer becomes unnecessary, except that made in regard to the right of an assignee of a bill of lading to sue in his own name - and as to that, upon a reconsideration, in the light of the argument on the motion for a new trial, the court is satisfied with the opinion then expressed. Pollard v. Vinton, 105 U. S. 7; Robinson v. Memphis & C. R. Co. 9 Fed. Rep. 129; Forbes v. Boston, etc., 26 Alb. Law J.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Bliven Mead v. . Hudson River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Stiles v. Davis & BartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. The Capitaine FaureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. Southern Express Co. v. Sottile Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. The Isola Di ProcidaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902
  5. Atchison v. International Land & Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API