People v. Alston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*554“A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where ‘there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines’ ” (People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920, 920-921 [2011], Iv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011], quoting Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; see People v Cruz, 74 AD3d 1305, 1306 [2010]). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure and, thus, properly designated the defendant a level three sex…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BussieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SivellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. AbreuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. OlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012