Legal Opinion

People v. Alston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*554“A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted where ‘there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines’ ” (People v Bussie, 83 AD3d 920, 920-921 [2011], Iv denied 17 NY3d 704 [2011], quoting Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; see People v Cruz, 74 AD3d 1305, 1306 [2010]). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure and, thus, properly designated the defendant a level three sex…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BussieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. SivellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. AbreuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. OlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API