Legal Opinion

United States v. Haney Chevrolet, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 28, 1974No. 73-22-Orl-Civ-YPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GEORGE C. YOUNG, Chief Judge.

The United States seeks in the above-entitled action to impose a civil penalty against Haney Chevrolet, Inc. for violation of Section 203(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C., Section 1857f-2(a)(3), and to restrain Haney Chevrolet, Inc. from any further violation of the Act. Section 203(a) (3) of the Clean Air Act provides :

The following acts and the causing thereof are prohibited—

for any person to remove or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Jacobi v. Claude Nolan, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Collazo v. John W. Campbell Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Padgett v. SCH. BD. OF ESCAMBIA CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Appeal of Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Perl v. K-Mart Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. United States v. Blue Skies Projects, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
  5. United States v. Economy Muffler & Tire Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API