Commonwealth v. Oliver
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was charged with larceny over $250 (G. L. c. 266, § 30 [1]) and larceny from a person sixty-five years or more of age (G. L. c. 266, § 25 [a]). Following separate trials, he was convicted of both charges. On the defendant’s consolidated appeal from both convictions, the Appeals Court reversed on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to establish either larceny by false pretenses or embezzlement. Commonwealth v. Oliver, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 770, 774-776 (2004). We granted the Commonwealth’s request for further appellate review. We agree with the Appeals Court that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GeaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. OliverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Commonwealth v. DiJohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. LongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Lily Transportation Corp. v. Royal Institutional Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005