Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Oliver

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was charged with larceny over $250 (G. L. c. 266, § 30 [1]) and larceny from a person sixty-five years or more of age (G. L. c. 266, § 25 [a]). Following separate trials, he was convicted of both charges. On the defendant’s consolidated appeal from both convictions, the Appeals Court reversed on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to establish either larceny by false pretenses or embezzlement. Commonwealth v. Oliver, 60 Mass. App. Ct. 770, 774-776 (2004). We granted the Commonwealth’s request for further appellate review. We agree with the Appeals Court that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. GeaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. OliverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. DiJohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. LongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Lily Transportation Corp. v. Royal Institutional Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API