Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This case was decided by Division B. Writ of error to the Criminal Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

The plaintiff in error upon his trial in the court below for burglary did not testify as a witness. A State witness had identified him when brought before her as the man whom she found in her room at night, and testified to the fact upon the witness stand. Commenting upon 'this testimony the attorney assisting the State in the prosecution in his argument to the jury said: “There was no denial of that accusation then, and there is none now.” This ivas objected to by the defendant’s counsel as in violation of the provision in Chapter 4400, acts of *391895, that no prosecuting attorney shall be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Ruloff v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Watt v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State v. MoxleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Louis Matire v. Louie WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API