Rankin v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault of a child. The jury assessed punishment at fifty years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. On appeal, Appellant raises five points of error. We affirm the judgment.
FACTS
On June 3, 1991, Tiffiney, the complainant, her sister Wendy, and their friends Linda, Jessica and Tabitha were swimming and playing at Jessica’s house. Appellant was also present. At some point in the day, Appellant offered the girls a chance to go horseback riding. Linda, Wendy and Tiffi-ney…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Vernon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Tamez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Rankin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Yates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.