Legal Opinion

Duke Grider v. B. Bowling

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 11, 2015No. 14-2869PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Duke Grider (“Grider”) and Kami Lee Grider filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Missouri state law claiming officers of the Springfield Police Department violated Grider’s statutory and constitutional rights, in part by using excessive force. The parties' filed motions for summary judgment. As relevant to this appeal, the district court found Officer Brandon Bowling was not entitled to qualified immunity on the excessive force claim. Officer Bowling appeals. We reverse.

I

Pursuant to the proper standard of review, described below, the following are the facts as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Chambers v. PennycookCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Levi Wilson v. Scott LampCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Gina Torres v. Lance CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  3. Wilson v. LampDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
  4. Don Ickes v. Craig GrassmyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. Zubrod v. HochDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API