Legal Opinion · Dissent

Agar v. Orda

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1934Published

1DissentCbane, J.

Is the Uniform Sales Act, also referred to as the Sales of Goods Act, article 5 of the Personal Property Law (§ 144), applicable to the sales of corporate stock? Section 82 of the act provides that a contract to sell “ goods ” is a contract whereby the seller agrees to transfer the property in “ goods ” to the buyer for a consideration called the price. A sale of “ goods ” is a contract whereby the seller transfers the property in “ goods ” to the buyer for a consideration called the price. Section 144, subdivision 1, provides that where, under a contract to sell or a sale, the property in “…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Pierpoint v. HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Van Brocklen v. . SmeallieNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Millard v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Ackerman v. . RubensNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API