State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
From the pleadings it is apparent that but one issue now remains to be determined; and that is the question of law whether under these undisputed operative facts the relator is entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus ordering the respondent Industrial Commission to allow the relator an attorney fee in the amount of $250.
Amended Section 1465-90, General Code, reads in part as follows:
"The commission shall definitely and specifically pass upon each and every issue raised in the claim, necessary for a proper and complete decision thereon. * * * If the order of the commission does not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BaumholtzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Eisenbarth v. ReusserOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.