Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1944No. 29781PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

From the pleadings it is apparent that but one issue now remains to be determined; and that is the question of law whether under these undisputed operative facts the relator is entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus ordering the respondent Industrial Commission to allow the relator an attorney fee in the amount of $250.

Amended Section 1465-90, General Code, reads in part as follows:

"The commission shall definitely and specifically pass upon each and every issue raised in the claim, necessary for a proper and complete decision thereon. * * * If the order of the commission does not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BaumholtzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cosgrove v. Williamsburg of Cincinnati Mgt. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Eisenbarth v. ReusserOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API