Legal Opinion

People v. Alvarez

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 12, 2019No. A152349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiggins, P.J.

*1269May a criminal defendant confined in a state mental hospital pursuant to a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) issue subpoenas duces tecum against the hospital and hospital police when there is no underlying active proceeding, motion or petition? No. We conclude, as did the trial court, that in the absence of any such proceedings the court's continuing jurisdiction over NGI cases does not support a generalized right of defendants to promulgate discovery to third parties unrelated to any active legal matter. We therefore affirm the trial court's order quashing the subpoenas duces…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Alford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API