Legal Opinion

Snead v. Bendigo

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 9, 1990No. Record 900423PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Russell

This appeal requires us to decide whether a judgment in favor of a physician in an action to collect fees operates as a collateral estoppel bar against a later malpractice action by the patient against the physician. We conclude that it does not.

The essential facts are undisputed. In 1984, Guy Finney Snead (the patient) suffered a broken leg in an automobile accident. He obtained medical treatment from Leopoldo L. Bendigo, M.D. In 1987, after the patient had failed to pay the physician’s bill for these services, Dr. Bendigo filed a notice of motion for judgment against him in the General…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bates v. DeversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. Hampton Roads Sanitation District v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. TransDulles Center, Inc. v. SharmaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Lane v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
  3. Angus v. Wald (In Re Wald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  4. Dual & Associates, Inc. v. WellsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  5. Horton v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API