Legal Opinion

People v. Peery

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1914No. Crim. No. 345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County and from an order refusing a new trial. M. L. Short, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. T. Cosper, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of rape and sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. Appeals were taken from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Counsel for appellant states that there is an appeal also from an order denying a motion made in arrest of judgment. No separate appeal lies from such an order, although that ruling is subject to review on the appeal taken from the judgment. (People v. Rogers, 163 Cal. 476, [126 Pac. 143].)

The female participant in the alleged crime was a girl of about nineteen years of age, the daughter, by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. De La Guerra v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. People v. BoggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. State of South Dakota v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. StraussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API