Legal Opinion
Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1994No. 91 Civ. 8150 (WK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, Senior District Judge.
On December 4, 1991, plaintiff Polymer Technology Corporation (“plaintiff’), a manufacturer of contact lens products, filed a complaint alleging trademark infringement, trademark counterfeiting, fraud, false designation of origin and unfair competition against several defendants, including Emile Mimran (“defendant”), who buys, sells and distributes such products and owns several entities, also named in the complaint, which sell such products by mail order and to retail outlets. Plaintiff sought a preliminary injunction against all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- El Greco Leather Products Company, Inc. D/B/A Candie's International, Cross-Appellee v. Shoe World, Inc., D/B/A Gussini, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. Granada Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Clairol, Inc. v. Boston Discount Center of Berkley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Clairol Inc. v. Cosmetics PlusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- L.G.B. Inc. v. Gitano Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Polymer Technology Corp. v. MimranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. Cosmetic Gallery, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Polymer Technology Corporation v. Emile MimranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994