Williams v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
The- Court of Appeals holds that there was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury as to whether or not the 'shrimp were taken from the prohibited zone, and this finding will not be reviewed by this Court. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.
It is strenuously argued that the statute under which this appellant was tried is violative of the Federal Constitution, and reliance is had on the case Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel, 278 U. S. 1, 49 S. Ct. 1, 73 E. Ed. 147, wherein a Louisiana statute, quite similar to ours, was declared unconstitutional. It…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. HaydelSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
3Cited by14 opinions
- Humphrey v. BoschungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Milazzo v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Terry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Ex Parte HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.