Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1998No. 73646PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Movant Ann Smith filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after she pleaded guilty to three counts of stealing $150 or more in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 1994. The motion court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. She appeals from this judgment, asserting that the motion court clearly erred in its denial because at her guilty plea hearing the plea court failed to inform her of the minimum penalty for her charges in violation of Rule 24.02(b).

Movant did not raise this issue in any of the pleadings she filed with the motion court. An issue not raised as a…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coates v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Edwards v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API