Legal Opinion
Anderson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 9, 1964No. 63-466PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Chief Judge.
The appellant, by this appeal, seeks review of an order of the trial court denying his motion, filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
The appellant alleged in his petition that his confinement was illegal, in that he was denied due process of law on the following grounds: (1) His arrest was illegal. (2) He was subjected to relentless interrogation. (3) He was not taken before the magistrate without undue delay. (4) He was denied right of bail. (S) The aforementioned matters were for the express purpose of procuring damaging statements…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milton v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- David Holston Roddy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Dykes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- United States v. Gerald Joseph KoptikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- United States v. William Thomas ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Selmon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967