Casey v. Casey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal, by Pincus Lowenfeld, purchaser at the sale in the above-entitled action, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Yew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of' the county of Yew York on the 11th day of January, 1897, compolling him to complete his purchase. The title of this action was as follows: “ Superior Court of the City of Yew York.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by Pincus Lowenfeld, purchaser at the sale in the above-entitled action, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Yew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of' the county of Yew York on the 11th day of January, 1897, compolling him to complete his purchase. The title of this action was as follows: “ Superior Court of the City of Yew York. “ William P. Casey, Thomas L. Casey and Catherine A. Casey, Plaintiffs, v. Mary E. Casey, William Powers, if living, and -Powers,, his wife, if any (who. as well as whose name is unknown to the plaintiffs, and the widow,…
1Opinion of the Court
Van Brunt, P. J.:
This action was brought for the' partition .or sale of certain.real property situate in the city of Yew York. Amongst others who were made defendants were William Powers, if living; David Powers, if living, and Mary Powers, if living, and if all, or either of them, were deceased, his or her devisees, heirs at law or next of kin who were unknown to the plaintiffs; and also all persons or owners unknown to plaintiffs having or claiming any interest in or *221lien upon the lands and premises sought to be partitioned.in this action.
The defendant's Powers and their devisees, heirs at…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Luby v. Washington Sterling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- McQuillan v. McQuillanNew York Supreme Court · 1912