Parker v. Pacific Box Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
' Plaintiffs brought suit against the Pacific Box Corporation as user of a bundle tying machine, hereinafter designated as the Eby machine, built according to the teaching of Dunn and Eldridge, alleging infringement of claims 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 52, 55, 60, 67, 75, and 76, of patent No. 1,875,259, and of claims 7, 12, 13, 65, 66, 69, 70, 76, 85, 86, and 87, of patent No. 1,875,260, both issued to Parker on August 30, 1932. Eby Manufacturing Company, manufacturer of the Eby machine, intervened and defended the action. The original defendant and the intervener…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.