Legal Opinion

DeMontluzin v. DeMontluzin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 12, 1985No. CA-2228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

464 So.2d 948 (1985)

Roch E.E. deMONTLUZIN, III

v.

Edith Eskrigge, wife of Roch E.E. deMONTLUZIN, III.

No. CA-2228.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

February 12, 1985.

Philip R. Riegel, Jr., Parlongue & Riegel, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Russ M. Herman, Steven J. Lane, Herman, Herman & Katz, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before REDMANN, C.J., and GULOTTA and WILLIAMS, JJ.

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This is a dispute over the meaning of a phrase in a consent judgment regarding post-divorce alimony and child support paid to Edith de Montluzin by Roch de Montluzin. The clause states:

"Th…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Chaisson v. ChaissonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. deMontluzin v. EskriggeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McAlpine v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  2. Impastato v. ImpastatoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Lee v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API