DeMontluzin v. DeMontluzin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
464 So.2d 948 (1985)
Roch E.E. deMONTLUZIN, III
v.
Edith Eskrigge, wife of Roch E.E. deMONTLUZIN, III.
No. CA-2228.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
February 12, 1985.
Philip R. Riegel, Jr., Parlongue & Riegel, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.
Russ M. Herman, Steven J. Lane, Herman, Herman & Katz, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before REDMANN, C.J., and GULOTTA and WILLIAMS, JJ.
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This is a dispute over the meaning of a phrase in a consent judgment regarding post-divorce alimony and child support paid to Edith de Montluzin by Roch de Montluzin. The clause states:
"Th…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bernhardt v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Chaisson v. ChaissonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- deMontluzin v. EskriggeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- McAlpine v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Impastato v. ImpastatoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lee v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006