Legal Opinion

Boehmer v. LeBoeuf

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 12, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Pursuant to M.R.CivP. 72(e), 1 this matter comes to us on report of an interlocutory ruling by the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Bradford, J.) granting the motion of the defendant, Donna J. LeBoeuf, for a new trial. At the conclusion of the trial and after the entry of a verdict for the plaintiffs, LeBoeuf moved for a new trial, contending inter alia that evidence had been improperly admitted. Following the court’s granting of that motion, the plaintiffs, Raquel and Peter Boehmer, moved to report the case and the Superior Court agreed to place the matter before us on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward George BoozCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Cope v. SevignySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. State v. DischerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Ames v. Dipietro-Kay Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Cates v. FarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GormanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Davis v. CurrierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API