Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1941 Model Ford Coach Motor No. 18-6054018

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1943No. 10682PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The suit was for remission of a forfeiture. Judgment was for the claimant, Associates Discount Corporation, and tile Government has appealed contending that remission should have been denied because of failure of the claimant to show compliance with the statutory condition precedent relating to investigation. 18 U.S.C.A.' § 646(b) (3).

The facts were specifically found by the District Judge and are not in dispute: On October 14, 1941, Thomas P. Hosner purchased the automobile in suit from a dealer in Tennessee. Associates Discount Corporation purchased the conditional sale contract from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Federal Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1950 Lincoln Sedan, Motor No. 50lp 14278lCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Murdock Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  3. United States v. One 1950 Dodge SedanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. Farrior Motor Co. IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. No. 13844Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API