National Surety Co. v. Stockyards National Bank
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Denison
The surety company, plaintiff below, was defeated on trial to the court on an agreed statement of facts and brings error. The surety company was subrogated to the rights of the American Commission Company. For brevity and clearness we shall spealc of the commission company as plaintiff.
The substantial facts are as follows: The commission company had an account at the defendant bank. It intrusted to one Decker, its employe, blank checks duly signed by its officers, with authority to fill them to pay bills not exceeding $100. The bank did not know of this limitation of authority, and it is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Merchants' Bank v. McClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- McNeely Co. v. Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Boughner v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
- Ayer v. YounkerColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Condado Aruba Caribbean Hotel v. TickelColorado Court of Appeals · 1977