MATTER OF SUAREZ v. Sadowski
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The Supreme Court was correct in holding that the respondents were not entitled to submit evidence to refute the findings of the Board of Elections that a large number of the signatures on the petition were invalid.
The candidates submitted 1,366 signatures and the Board of Elections held that 472 were valid. Since a total of 346 valid signatures was needed the Board of Elections declared the respondents as candidates for certain Democratic Party positions. The petitioners commenced this proceeding by order…
2Cited by27 opinions
- MATTER OF KRUEGER v. RichardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Belak v. RossiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Matter of Gadsen v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Halloway v. BlakelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Messina v. Albany County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.