Legal Opinion

Metildi v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided September 25, 1941No. Claim No. 25883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

The Attorney-General has formally moved to dismiss the above-entitled claim on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In considering the motion the facts pleaded in .the claim must be taken as true. They are, in substance, that on March 1, 1940, while claimant’s intestate, Theodore Metildi, was engaged in performing his duties as an employee of the Meyo Construction Company, Inc., on the Soppe Block located on Main street in Canandaigua, N. Y., one of the walls of the building caved in, whereby he sustained injuries which caused his death. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clinton v. BoehmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. DiCaprio v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Chastaine v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Claim of the Estate of Klee v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Fiumara v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Heiston v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959
  5. Synesael v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API