Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and a new trial, ordered.

Defendant did not request a missing witness charge as to the prosecution’s failure to call Deputy Shirley to testify and no reviewable issue is presented as to that matter. The prosecution, however, was not entitled to the charge, to which defendant objected, which expressly forbade the jury from drawing any negative inference from the prosecution’s failure to call Deputy Shirley. Thus, the trial court’s instruction on this issue was error.

Additionally, it was error on the part of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Constantine v. LetoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. LebrechtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
  5. People v. McDonoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API