Jenkins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
OPINION DISSENTING TO DISMISSAL OF APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TEAGUE, Judge.
When a majority of this Court does something that is totally inconsistent with a prior decision or decisions of this Court, our presiding judge exclaims “Color Me Amazed”. See for example Aldrighetti v. State, 507 S.W.2d 770, 775 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); and Antunez v. State, 647 S.W.2d 649, 651 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). In light of what this Court did in Gauldin v. State, 683 S.W.2d 411 (Tex.Cr.App.1983), and what it does in this cause, I must echo the above statement.
In Gauldin v. State, supra, this Court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.