Cook v. Hunter
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By NICHOLS, J.
Error is prosecuted to this court upon the sole ground that the trial court erred in sustaining the motion of defendant for a directed verdict, that being the only ground alleged in plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. • It must be conceded that if, from plaintiff’s evidence, reasonable minds can reach no conclusion except in favor of the defendant, it is error for the trial court to overrule the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v Huff, 126 Oh St 469 (Hamden Lodge v Ohio Fuel Gas Co., 127 Oh St 469, approved and followed).
In determining…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fred W. Albrecht Grocery Co. v. OverfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Geisking v. SheimoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Enyart v. BlacketorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Schoenborn v. BRODERICKOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- In re C.Boss County Court of Common Pleas · 1975
- Malcom v. DempseySuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.