Legal Opinion

Pearson v. City of Huntsville

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1964No. 8 Div. 865PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction of remaining on premises of another after being requested to leave. Code 1940, T. 14, § 426. 1

Here the city recorder sat as a judge of a state court. Code 1940, T. 37, § 594. He did not purport to sentence the defendant to work on the city streets but assessed "three months at hard labor for Madison County.” Cf. Code 1940, T. 37, § 595 (fines and punishments by recorders trying misdemeanors same as in state courts).

I

Municipal corporations may pass ordinances to carry out their charters. When they seek to penalize breaches of their bylaws they…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Case v. Mayor of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Lane v. McFadyenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Taylor v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Clark v. EagertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Williamson v. City of GreenvilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Royer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. Mays v. City of PrattvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Whitehead v. City of RussellvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Lazarte v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  5. Cooper v. City of DauphneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API