Legal Opinion

Emmons v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 155, Calendar No. 36,246Published

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of property on Ohio boulevard, so-called, in the city of Detroit, and by her bill of complaint seeks to have the city enjoined from collecting an unpaid instalment of a paving tax. She bases her right to relief on the provision in the Detroit city charter which provides that the cost of paving boulevards shall be paid by the city at large rather than being assessed against abutting property as in the case of ordinary streets and avenues. Prom the decree granting the relief sought defendant has appealed.

Since this case was disposed of in the circuit decision was rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Houseman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API