Legal Opinion

Sandlin v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1931No. 6 Div. 847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The prosecution in this case was for the violation of ordinance 317-C. of the city of Birmingham. The specific charge being that the appellant, within the police jurisdiction of said city, did have in possession prohibited liquors and beverages, etc. The prosecution originated in the recorder’s court, and, from a judgment of conviction therein, he appealed to the circuit court and was there tried by a jury, was again convicted, and appealed here. Pending the trial, no exception was reserved to any ruling of the court, except to its action in overruling the motion for a new trial. Assignments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Benton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Weaver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Physicians' & Dentists' Business Bureau v. DrayWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API