Legal Opinion
Royal v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 14, 1999No. 99-1510PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
736 So.2d 157 (1999)
Arthur James ROYAL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-1510.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 14, 1999.
Arthur James Royal, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
2Per curiam
As the trial court's exercise of discretion in ruling on a motion for mitigation pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) is not subject to review on appeal, the appeal is dismissed. See Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Moya v. State, 668 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996);…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Moya v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Lusskin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Bourjolly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
4Cited by10 opinions
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. SwettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Concepcion v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.