Legal Opinion

Valentine v. Roberts

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 15, 1902No. 128aPublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to quash writ of arrest in a civil action issued and served on Sunday.

1Opinion of the Court 1

BROWN, District Judge.

This case came to this court on appeal from the United States Commissioner’s Court at Juneau.

On the 23d day of August, 1901, as appears by the files in this case, Emery Valentine instituted proceedings in a civil action against the defendant, John R. Roberts, to recover the value of a ring said to have been unlawfully and improperly appropriated to his own use by the said Roberts after the same had been lent to him by the plaintiff on the promise of said Roberts to return the same. Upon an affidavit filed with the complaint, an order of arrest was issued, and placed in…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Wade.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and GriggSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Ooe, Ex Demise of Patterson v. Winn and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Scammon v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Commonwealth v. KnowltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GottschalkCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  2. State v. GottschalkCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API