Legal Opinion
Town of Greenburgh v. New York State Board of Equalization & Assessment
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioner failed to demonstrate that the methodology for computing its equalization rate was not rational and that *447the equalization rate was not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Town of Greenburgh v New York State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 226 AD2d 546; Matter of Town of Harrison v New York State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 226 AD2d 548; Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook v New York State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 209 AD2d 765, 766; Matter of City of White Plains v New York State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 205 AD2d 771, 772; Matter of Town of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Town of Greenburgh v. New York State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town of Patterson v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- City of White Plains v. New York State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. New York State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Town of Harrison v. New York State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of White Plains v. New York State Board of Real Property ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Town of Cortlandt v. New York State Board of Real Property ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Town of Cortlandt v. New York State Board of Real Property ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001