Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Whittemore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 14, 2007No. A07A1814PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial, Michael and Marsha Hernandez (collectively “Hernandez”) appeal a judgment in favor of John Whittemore declaring that a 1.32 acre strip of Hernandez’s land is subject to an *252easement for access to Whittemore’s neighboring property. Hernandez contends that the trial court erred in finding that a plat recorded by his predecessor was sufficient, in the absence of a deed or other instrument, to create the easement. We disagree and affirm.

“The [trial] court is the trier of fact in a bench trial, and its findings will be upheld on appeal if there is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hardage v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. Investguard, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Crowell v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Safeco Title Insurance v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Lewis v. BowenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. smith/burns LLC v. 905 Bernina Avenue Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Haygood v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. DeNAPOLI Et Al v. OWEN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  4. smith/burns LLC v. 905 Bernina Avenue Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API