Legal Opinion
Whitnell v. Silverman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 8, 1992No. 92-C-0619PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
598 So.2d 345 (1992)
Lorraine S. WHITNELL, et al.
v.
Dr. Arthur SILVERMAN et al.
No. 92-C-0619.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 8, 1992.
Granted in part and denied in part: (1) granted for the purpose of remanding the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing and ruling on whether R.S. 9:5628 is unconstitutional. (2) Otherwise denied. The trial court correctly concluded that the doctor did not prevent timely filing of plaintiff's action intentionally, fraudulently, or by ill practice. It is so ordered.
CALOGERO, C.J., concurs in remand action (1), but dissents from denial of balance of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical CenterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Whitnell v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Whitnell v. SilvermanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Jenkins v. DyessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.