Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Frazier Land & Timber Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 19, 1995No. 24244PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

This is an appeal from the circuit court’s order reversing appellant’s (Fund’s) decision denying reimbursement to respondent (Liberty). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Leroy Small, an employee of Frazier Land and Timber Co. (Frazier), was paralyzed by a work-related accident. Small was rendered totally and permanently disabled for worker’s compensation purposes.1 Small had several prior permanent impairments, one of which was diabetes. Small’s diabetes aggravated his paralysis causing him to undergo a double amputation. Frazier’s workers’ compensation insurance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Springs Industries, Inc. v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dumas v. InfoSafe Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Lib. Mut. Ins. v. Sc 2nd Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Collins v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. American Yard ProductsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API