Legal Opinion
Borges v. Placeres
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 5, 2014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment, entered September 14, 2012, affirmed, with $25 *63costs. Appeal from orders, entered, respectively, February 16, 2012 and June 15, 2012, dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment. The issues raised on the appeal from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
This legal malpractice action arises out of defendant attorney’s representation of plaintiff, a Venezuelan native, in connection with an immigration matter. The trial evidence showed, and it is not seriously…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Dombrowski v. BulsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Harvey v. Mazal American PartnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Barnett v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Borges v. Placeres (In re Placeres)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Parlux Fragrances, LLC v. S. Carter Enters., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Borges v. Placeres (In re Placeres)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Borges v. PlaceresAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019