Legal Opinion
McKinney & Nazareth, P.C. v. Jarmoszko
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided June 13, 2001No. Nos. 2000-104-M.P., 2000-21-AppealPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Court on May 8, 2001, pursuant to an order that directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this petition for certiorari should not be decided at this time. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this petition for certio-rari should be decided at this time. The facts insofar as pertinent to this petition are as follows.
The defendant, Gregory J. Jarmoszko (defendant), is a former client of…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Harold Affanato v. Merrill Brothers and Cianbro Corporation, Appeal of Cianbro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Medeiros v. Hilton Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Security Pacific Credit (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Lau King JanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
4Cited by2 opinions
- R.C. Associates v. Centex General Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Sean Marchionte v. Francisco JaramilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018