Prince v. Prince
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice:
This case involves the interpretation of life insurance provisions in a divorce decree.
The trial judge held that upon remarriage of the wife, some two years after entry of the decree, the husband had no further obligation to pay premiums on the policies involved. He dismissed a contempt petition citing the husband for discontinuing the payments. He held, however, that the husband, at the option of the wife, would be obligated to pay to her in a lump sum any cash values of the policies as of the date of her remarriage. The Court of Appeals reversed. It concluded that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maginnis v. MaginnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Magarrell v. MagarrellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Wiederanders v. WiederandersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Lynch v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bray v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Prim v. PrimTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Wendell v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989