Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Pacific Endowment League

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1893No. 14996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion*

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

The following is a copy of the complaint in this action :—

“ The plaintiff in the above-entitled action complains of the defendant therein, and for cause of action alleges:—
“1. That said defendant is a voluntary and unincorporated association of a very large number of persons, and has for its object the payment of endowments in the sum of $500 at certain periods, computed according to the age of the member, until the aggregate payments to each member amount to the sum of $5,000.

‘‘ That said sums of $500 are paid to the members out of a fund created for that special purpose, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crossman v. Massachusetts Benefit Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Thomas v. WhallonNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Pacific Mutual Insurance v. GuseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Levy v. Magnolia Lodge, No. 29, I. O. O. F.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ibs v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Mutual Aid Union v. PerdueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Huffman v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Milton G. Cooper & Son, Inc. v. William R. Davis & Brother, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API