Legal Opinion

Apollinaris Brunnen v. Somborn

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 16, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

Upon the hearing of the motion of the orator for a preliminary injunction in this cause, it is considered, that the use, by the defendants, on their labels and bottles, of the word “Apol-linis,” in connection with the representation of a bow and arrow, or anchor, as used by them, on account of the similarity between them and the word “Apollinaris” and the representation of an anchor, as before used by the orator, is calculated to lead those using and dealing in such waters, to suppose that the waters of the defendants, so marked, are the waters of the orator; and, as…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Luckel, King & Cake Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  2. Glen Cove Manuf'g Co. v. LudelingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  3. Garrett & Co. v. A. Schmidt, Jr., & Bros. Wine Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API