Legal Opinion

Bloodgood v. Bloodgood

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action by wife to have marriage annulled for alleged impotency of husband. Application for alimony and counsel fee.

1Opinion of the CourtJ. F. Daly, J.

— I find in the opinion of the court of appeals in Griffin agt. Griffin (47 N. Y., 134), delivered by Rapallo, J., the very decided expression of opinion that the provisions of the Revised Statutes as to requiring the husband to pay sums necessary to carry on the suit during its pendency are “ very properly restricted to cases where the wife admits *43the existence of a valid marriage, and seeks a divorce or separation for subsequent misconduct of the husband. Where she denies the existence of the marriage she cannot consistently claim that the defendant is under any obligation to provide her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BrinsmadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Meo v. MeoNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gore v. GoreNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gore v. GoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Gore v. GoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API