Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Gibson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2001No. 99-6311PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Randall Eugene Cannon appeals from the district court’s denial of his federal habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his petition, Cannon lodged numerous challenges to his Oklahoma first degree murder and arson convictions and to his death sentence. The district court denied relief as to each claim but granted Cannon a certificate of appeal-ability (“COA”) to raise five issues on appeal. See supra section II.B. After conducting a case management conference, this court granted Cannon a COA to raise three additional issues. See supra…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Joseph Murl Bennett v. Glen Mueller, Warden Cal Terhune, Director Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Cargle v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Fontenot v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  4. McCambridge v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Spears v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API