Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Dahlstrom

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided May 29, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00266Unknown

1Opinion

WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA RYAN BRADSHAW, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 3:24-cv-00266-HRH ) NANCY DAHLSTROM and ) JEN WINKELMAN, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion to Dismiss1 Defendants Nancy Dahlstrom and Jen Winkelman move pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint filed by Plaintiff Ryan Bradshaw for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Plaintiff responded in opposition,2 and Defendants replied.3 Oral argument was not requested and is not…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API